More sloppy science
Sep. 9th, 2011 12:29 pmFurther thought on my post yesterday... If you really had a bucket with one hundred pounds of an isotope with a half-life of 3 years or so, it would have to be a very special bucket. And you and your neighbors would probably not be happy. If your hypothetical bucket-o-zappy-crap really lost 50 lbs. by conversion to energy in three years... it would be emitting 21.6 gigawatts on average.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-09 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-09 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-09 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-10 06:20 pm (UTC)And I'm afraid all I have to contribute is lead would be very very much less than bendy and wouldn't provide the best in ventilation either.
Lead-lined cargo pants and a lead-lined hoodie would be way better.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-09 08:27 pm (UTC)It's just gotten dumber in terms of plausibility-fail.
I'm watching it anyways, out of the same grotesque fascination which causes us to read about train wrecks. I haven't quite had the energy to rant about the more spectacularly silly plot developments / abuses of science / abuses of common sense / abuses of sanity, but then one of the LJers that I follow (
no subject
Date: 2011-09-10 02:21 am (UTC)I was getting pretty annoyed by the repeated assertion that everybody in the world had become immortal while Harkness had become mortal. That last part was an assumption for no reason at all; it was far more likely that he was in exactly the same situation as everybody else — might get extremely damaged but wouldn't die.